Skip to content
Use the search to find information about InterSystems products and solutions, career opportunities, and more.

Crossing the Payer-Provider Chasm: Getting to Shared Risk, Shared Data

by Lynda Rowe

stethoscope and pen lying on a medical form

I recently read an article in New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) Catalyst1 that showed that the “alignment” between providers and payers does not seem to be closing, despite the industry shift to value-based payment. The survey, conducted among executives, clinical leaders, and clinicians, finds that three-quarters (77%) of respondents do not consider payers and providers aligned toward realizing improved value in care delivery. More than half (58%) feel their own organizations are not aligned. Moreover, only three percent of respondents say payers and providers are extremely or very aligned at the industry level.

According to this survey, this lack of alignment hampers integration of care and services and is a primary driver of our high healthcare costs. The study highlighted key areas where payers and providers should be able to collaborate or align along with the percentage of respondents who thought there was alignment:

 

Key Areas Where Payers and Providers Should Collaborate% Aligned
Quality58%
Patient/Member Experience45%
Care Coordination37%
Cost33%
Data for Decision Making33%

 

In some ways, I don’t find these results too surprising, given that there is still a lack of financial incentives between payers and providers. Despite all the talk about the shift to value-based payment, just under 30 percent of all health care payments in the US are tied to alternative payment models (APMs).2 This is a six percent increase over data collected the prior year — good progress, but lower than expected.

To look at the current data of APM adoption, the Healthcare Payment Learning and Action Network LAN APM Measurement Effortdetermined the following results for 2016 payments:

 

Alternative Payment Model (APM) 2016 Payments

43%
of health care dollars in Category 1
(e.g., traditional FFS or other legacy payments not linked to quality)
28%
of health care dollars in Category 2
(e.g., pay-for-performance or care coordination fees)
29%
of health care dollars in a composite of Categories 3 and 4
(e.g., shared savings, shared risk, bundled payment, or population based payments)

 

As another NEJM Catalyst article recently stated, many providers find themselves with a foot in two canoes — a very challenging place for the industry. As long as they continue to see consistent revenue in the fee-for-service model, there’s no burning platform for change.

However, herein lies the problem: if payers and providers are not aligned on the shift to shared risk and financial accountability, they also won’t be lined up to work together on quality, cost, and operational efficiency — that is, better care at a lower cost.

To succeed, we need to close the gaps. Many of the existing barriers stem from a history of misaligned goals and incentives and lack of transparency between organizations. As noted above, payers and providers are least aligned on leveraging data to make better decisions for system improvements, and that’s a solvable problem.

data chart

So what is the path forward to cross the chasm? Based on current trends, value-based care — although moving slowly — appears to be part of the new fabric of healthcare. As providers and payers continue to take on more shared risk, the alignment gaps will close. To achieve the outcomes we want, payers and providers will need to show more transparency, which requires two-way data sharing. My observation has been that, although barriers exist to providers sharing their data with payers, data needs to fl ow in both directions to get to a win-win scenario. Payers can help their provider network perform better against quality, cost, and utilization measures by sharing that information. Conversely, having access to clinical data will allow health plans to streamline some administrative processes such as pre-authorization and HEDIS/STARS reporting to drive cost and wasted time out of the system.

We have heard from our forward-leaning customers that two-way data sharing leads to success. The best outcome, however, will be better, more coordinated care for patients.


Sources: 1 https://catalyst.nejm.org/new-marketplace-survey-payers-and-providers-remain-far-apart/ 2 According to an October 30 report from the Health Care Payment Learning & Action Network – a public-private partnership launched by the US Department of Health and Human Services. 3 https://hcp-lan.org/groups/apm-fpt-work-products/apm-report/

Andere Bronnen Die Je Misschien Leuk Vindt

10 Oct 2024
Get Your Data AI-Ready and Simplify Development and Deployment
Unleash the power of AI in healthcare with InterSystems solutions for seamless FHIR integration and development.
09 Aug 2024
A CHIME Thought Leadership Roundtable
At a CHiME Roundtable, executives from leading HCOs came together to discuss how artificial intelligence revolutionize clinical care.
24 Jul 2024
Alle relevante informatie op het juiste moment op de juiste plaats
In de gezondheidszorg worden gegevens gegenereerd in een groot aantal organisaties, geografische locaties en vakgebieden. De informatie is gedecentraliseerd in verschillende formaten en wordt vaak gewijzigd. Hier komt de Clinical Viewer in beeld als onderdeel van InterSystems HealthShare Unified Care Records.
02 May 2024
Digital Health Insights
Secure and clean FHIR data can help providers produce valuable insights to improve population health outcomes and personalized care.
05 Apr 2024
A CHIME Thought Leadership Roundtable
At a CHiME Roundtable, executives from leading HCOs came together to discuss how they are addressing the shift to consumerism and creating digital experiences that meet – and exceed – rising expectations.
27 Feb 2024
Dankzij de nieuwe integratielaag op basis van InterSystems Healthcare en het Unified Care Record hebben de artsen in Sint Maartenskliniek snel toegang tot de patiëntgegevens.
20 Feb 2024
De uitstekende prestaties van eNose Company hebben geleid tot een samenwerking met InterSystems, en samen hebben ze de mijlpaal bereikt van de introductie van de aeoNose™ in zorginstellingen.
13 Feb 2024
FHIR Use Cases
Practical applications for FHIR and real-world examples of how FHIR connects disparate systems, accelerates digital transformation, and increase data insights.
05 Feb 2024
Marshfield Clinic Health System
Mitchell Kwiatkowski, Chief Data & Analytics Officer at Marshfield Clinic Health System, explains the company’s IT overhaul and how AI can be used ethically.
05 Feb 2024
CHIME Digital Health Most Wired Survey
The Digital Health Most Wired Survey and Interoperability and Population Health In the tumultuous landscape within which healthcare operates, the annual CHIME Digital Health Most Wired (DHMW) survey is a significant “north star” that healthcare organizations (HCOs) have relied upon for years. Widely known for the annual Most Wired recognition awards, the DHMW survey provides healthcare leaders a comprehensive profile of digital health usage in U.S. HCOs and a reliable resource by which to benchmark their own digital health progression.

Take The Next Step

We’d love to talk. Fill in some details and we’ll be in touch.
*Required Fields
Highlighted fields are required
*Required Fields
Highlighted fields are required

By submitting your business contact information to InterSystems through this form, you acknowledge and agree that InterSystems may process this information, for the purpose of fulfilling your submission, through a system hosted in the United States, but maintained consistent with any applicable data protection laws.



** By selecting yes, you give consent to be contacted for news, updates and other marketing purposes related to existing and future InterSystems products and events. In addition, you consent to your business contact information being entered into our CRM solution that is hosted in the United States, but maintained consistent with applicable data protection laws.